Table Of Content
In contrast, the Cessna 172 may have to take a fuel stop which depending on your needs could be a lot of wasted time. While it outdoes the 172 in nearly every metric, the Skylane is a remarkably unremarkable aircraft that has contributed to its reputation as an all-around good plane. It isn’t the best at really anything, but it is a well-rounded and reliable go-to for tons of aviators regardless of experience. It’s a great hobby aircraft, while also maintaining a great reputation for training and other utilities. The best place for you is going to depend on your mission and what sort of utility you’re looking for.
Anti-icing and De-icing Systems for Aircraft- Options and How They Work
In 1979, the 182Q featured bladder fuel tanks were replaced with a wet-wing design which allowed sealed portions of the wing structure itself to become the fuel tank. It has a 28-volt electrical system with 2,950-pound gross weight. The first one is the landing gear, which can be fixed or retractable. With 87 gallons in the tanks and a typical burn of 17 gph at high cruise, plan on 600 nm plus reserve between fuel stops.
Cessna 182RG Specs and Performance – Skylane Specs and Review
After production resumed in 1997, both regular and turbocharged Cessna 182 models were produced with versions of the IO-540 to help standardize the fleet. Thanks to new manufacturing facilities originally destined for the business jet market, the build quality of post-break Skylanes is said to be even better than before. Handling in the pattern is simple as long as you keep the trim moving. It remains a low 50 knots, and that means approaches as slow as 60 to 65 knots aren’t unreasonable. Cessna recommends a 66-knot short-field approach speed, equal to 1.3 Vso, but I’ve used 60 knots many times with power on and never experienced that “verge of destruction” feeling. However, diving deeper into its capabilities, the 182 Skylane emerges as the more robust contender, boasting superior power, cruising speed, cabin space, and range.
What Are The Main Differences Between The C182 Skylane Vs The C172 Skyhawk
Another contributor to this potential problem is that, with the mixture knob all the way in, the engine is running too rich. I have spoken with many other TR182 owners whose engines have made and exceeded TBO without a top overhaul. That makes me feel better when I cross the Bay of Fundy at night. This was a major selling point when comparing to the 210, which has a lower TBO and often does not make it to TBO. Cost of operation has been reasonable and there have been no maintenance surprises and no ADs.
While the 172 was already a success story, Cessna aimed to cater to a market segment that desired more power, range, and carrying capacity. Mike Ojo, of popular aviation YouTube channel “MojoGrip,” along with a savvy team of pilots, initially launched LookUpAviation earlier this year. The goal of LookUpAviation is to create modern solutions and great customer service for a rather dated industry. These specifications are not unique to all variants or models of the Cessna 182. These are just standard specs from the Aircraft POH, Cessna, and AOPA.
Carenado Releases C182 RG II for MSFS - FSElite
Carenado Releases C182 RG II for MSFS.
Posted: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 07:00:00 GMT [source]
This is the standard fuel burn for single Lycoming IO-540-AB1A5 piston engine models assuming they do not exceed weight capacity. Introduced in 1956, the 182 quickly became a hit due to its flexibility and ease of operation, spawning a total of 23 variants over time. Whether in its regular, retractable-gear, or turbocharged versions, it has made its name as an honest aircraft that gets owners their moneys worth without needless excesses. Like many of you, I’ve logged my share of hours in C-182s of one description or another, fixed-gear and retractable, normally-aspirated and turbocharged.
Flying the Cessna 182
The Retractable 182s were available from 1978 thru 1986 and came in both normally aspirated and turbocharged versions. A turbo also expedites high altitude cruise for those pilots who don’t mind sucking on supplemental oxygen. A built-in, four-position oxygen system is standard on the T-Skylane, and the new generation of cannulas makes oxygen use more tolerable than the old, full facemasks. The gas still dries out your throat and sinuses, but it does facilitate travel four miles above the Earth for those pilots who are so inclined. It rides much lighter on the gear than a fixed-gear 182 because of the nose-up attitude so crosswinds are trickier.
Cessna 182 speed and fuel burn
Two doors and a wide cabin are important as we make many trips with our two golden retrievers. Many of our trips are of the 400- to 900-mile length so speed is important. TAS at 23 squared and about 13 to 13.5 GPH runs about 156 to 158 knots at 10,000 feet. My TAS runs a bit higher than book, likely a reflection of the gap seals from Knots 2U. The Skylane cabin is famously roomy and easy to access with a wide door on each side and windows that open on both, in most models. That big box of a cabin, however, flexes and the door and windshield fit can get sloppy over the years.
Rate of climb sea level
While they may seem similar at a glance, understanding the nuanced differences between these two aircraft can be crucial for potential buyers, flight schools, and aviation enthusiasts alike. They both offer forgiving controls and can be nearly impossible to spin, due to their high mounted wings. If you’re stuck between the 172 and 182, consider what you’ll use the plane for. If you need a faster plane that goes farther and higher, you’ll want to go with the 182. But if you’re looking for cost efficiency and don’t mind that it’s a bit less powerful, the 172 is an easy choice.
Other than that, the 182 often sports a G1000 set up in most that are on the market. However, there are a few with traditional steam gauges if that is what you are more interested in. The Cessna 172 is the most popular Cessna aircraft, with the 182 taking a close second. One can only assume that the financial accessibility of the 172 is a contributing factor to taking that first prize ribbon. A lot of pilots may not consider the bigger and stronger nature of the Skylane worth the cost difference, given that it is essentially a sized-up version of its predecessor. The two are neck-in-neck in ratings and pilot preference because they are just very similar aircraft.
It provides code tables for aerodromes, air operators including the world's major airlines and for ICAO and IATA codes for aircraft. The website has also a photo gallery and gives you an overview of all aviation museums worldwide. A popular ‘party trick’ of the Cessna 182 is its roughly identical take-off and landing requirements.
As a result, the finished airplane was rated for only 235 hp, a mere 5 hp more than the original Skylane. These aircraft can get up and go with newer models offering a max range of 915 nautical miles, about the distance from Central Illinois to New York. Its speed tops out at 175ktas, though cruise speeds fall quite a bit lower. With its 87-gallon fuel tank, you can easily fly 6 -7 hours from a single takeoff. Max climb is 924 fpm, which outdoes a Cessna 172 by more than 200 feet.
They cruise comfortably and quickly with a max cruise speed of 145 ktas. They aren’t the fastest plane on the market, but they certainly aren’t the slowest. Skylanes have seen major changes throughout history, some more incremental than others. We have gathered fuel economy data about the 182 directly from Cessna technical data sheets.
In fact, it is one of the most common aircraft we help our clients buy. The Cessna 182 is a simple, reliable, and safe aircraft easily accessible to pilots of all skill levels. Its packed full of utility and performance with excellent parts support and a ton of upgrade options.
Modified Cessna 182s vs Stock – Disciples of Flight - Disciples of Flight
Modified Cessna 182s vs Stock – Disciples of Flight.
Posted: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 07:00:00 GMT [source]
In 1986, the last year of Skylane RG production, a normally aspirated RG sold for $136,680 and a turbo model had an average list of $150,755. The pivotal question for potential buyers revolves around their intended use of the aircraft. For those prioritizing distance, altitude, and speed, the C182 stands out.
No comments:
Post a Comment